Ancient astronaut theory brings to the forefront archaeological mysteries and posits an extraterrestrial explanation for them. These mysteries include the pyramids in Egypt (and elsewhere), the Nazca lines, Stone Henge, as well as ancient devices and artifacts that don't seem to fit with what we think we know about ancient civilization.
Of course, all of this ancient astronaut stuff is controversial because it goes against much of what mainstream archaeology has to say while using archaeology to back up its claims. There are some pretty convincing arguments in either direction but I haven't been convinced one way or the other.
I think that the primary issue is that we perhaps don't give our ancestors enough credit. They were just as intelligent as we are; they just didn't have the benefit of thousands of years of knowledge. Is it really that impossible that they could have built immense pyramids on their own? Then again, maybe they had some help (in the form of technology, knowledge, or both). Our ancestors most likely had the same strength of imagination as us; could they not have just dreamed up these strange creatures and objects we see in paintings and carvings?
I do think that it's a possibility that we have been visited by extraterrestrials in the past (so does Carl Sagan), but, while there are a lot of mysteries, I don't think any of them point directly to alien visitors or spacecraft. Plenty of examples can be interpreted in such a way, but, as with most areas of the paranormal, there is little concrete evidence to be found (or at least any that is widely-known).
I think that ancient astronaut theory asks the right questions and provokes discussion of some of the very weird things that we have discovered through archaeology. However, I'm not sure that it presents absolute proof that we are an alien experiment, that aliens gave us technology or knowledge, or that there are aliens at all. I think that only time will tell us the truth about that.
Ancient astronauts on Wikipedia.
No comments:
Post a Comment